![]() |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| With anti-aliasing | Without anti-aliasing |
![]() |
![]() |
| 6,654 bytes | 2,184 bytes |
With or without anti-aliasing, which one is better? Its a matter of opinion I guess. In this case I tend to like the image with anti-aliasing, although I can understand the argument that anti-aliasing makes the image blurry and obscures some of the fine detail (compare the two sailors on the boat the image on the right is clearer in the fine details). Images with anti-aliasing applied to them require more colours as a result file size tends to be larger in this case the image on the left is over 4,400 bytes larger.
Another issues worth mentioning is that applying transparent colours to images without anti-aliasing is far more strait foreword since there are no intermediate colours to worry about.